Content posted on this page is to only be about improving the article itself.
For all other types of discussion, please post them in the forums. This includes (but not limited to) theories, discussion about how great someone is, fanon stories, etc. You have been warned. Please remember to sign your comments with ~~~~ (four tildes).
Why is that even there? "Xpcveaoqfoxso" is simply the encoded name of the episode. Not only that, but Disney doesn't use that prank name any more. If we were to add that unofficial title we'd have to add the other names as well which are: "Xpcveaoqfoxso 2: Escape From Mabelland" and "Xpcveaoqfoxso 3: Take Back The Falls." Unreadable and very conjectural in my opinion.
I put it there because that was the only episode that they ever used a "prank name" (as you call it). There would be no reason to add it to 2x19 and 2x20 because that title was not used when announcing the episode. Only for 2x18. It's just trivia, not a redirect or anything.
Actually, yes, the names I stated we're used when announcing said episodes we even had a discussion about this. I'm not going to fight over the same thing again so do has you please. Trivia or not I'm not going to "fight back."
I didn't realize that XFinity also used that for 2x19, but they also got the second half of the title wrong. Anywhoseits, you seem to have a preference whether or not it ends up in the trivia. But if you don't mind so much, I think it has a place in the trivia for the episode.
If it were up to me, we would also have the "Escape from Mabelland" alternate title in the trivia section for Episode 39 as well. If we can have the trivia in Soos Ramirez about TV captions misspelling his name as "Zeus" I don't see why we can't have Trivia about TV Guides making mistakes with the episode title.
1. The "Zeus" trivia shouldn't even be there. Why, because, there is no source. Anyone's TV captions could have a misspelling. Heck, my TV said "Eipper Pines" once. Only official Disney spelling mistakes are allowed see this example (link not the bad grammar).
2. There's no way I'm going through this again. Be it wrong or right, you may do as you will, I'm not going to go against it.
You are right on the no source thing, but there are obvious reasons for not adding the "Eipper" thing, even if it has a source. Whereas, if a source can be found, the Zeus thing may be restored (assuming if happens often, not just one or two times).