Content posted on this page is to only be about improving the article itself. For all other types of discussion, please post them in the forums. |
Terminology
Is it really worth adding stuff like its name being wrong and not actually dinosaurs. I mean that's hardly common knowledge and this is a cartoon. Even though pterodactyls aren't dinosaurs I still call them dinosaurs. Even though the correct term isn't pterodactyl I still call them pterodactyls. I think this information is unnecessary. Cartoon logic =/= real logic. OnlyOnTuesdays88 talk 19:20, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
I know most people don't actually care about the correct names - they see any prehistoric animal and they instantly call it a "dinosaur". But the information is in the trivia section, and not the main part of the article. Nobody has to read it if they're not interested - and if they are, they may actually learn something interesting from that kind of info. I think it should stay.
Tgomola (talk) 19:43, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I think it should stay. However, it should NOT be in the "list of goofs". Mr BKnew yourfather I did! 15:47, June 25, 2015 (UTC)