FANDOM

YazzyDream

Councilor Bureaucrat
  • I live in NYC
  • I was born on September 5
  • I am female
  • Bio Edit. Edit. Edit.
  • [Show More]
Yo! I'm an admin. Be good. I'll try to help if I can. Just be patient and mind your manners. If you've got questions about articles, look here. If you wanna upload images be sure to see this. Wanna know how to become an admin? Read this. And here's our Code of Conduct. More help? check these.
Fellow admins: EvergreenFir | ThePK | Peacexfreedom [edit]

An anonymous contributor
  Loading editor
  • Hey. Sorry to bother you, but I changed the "Other names" section of Greg, on the page "Greg and Janice Valentino", and I don't know how reference the source (the "Spells" page of Journal 3) without mess with the order of the numbers, since there is already a reference of it on the same page. Can you do it (or just delete the change if you think it's better)? Thanks.

      Loading editor
  • I had accidentally uploaded that one video twice months ago. I tried contacting another admin at the time but never heard back. Thanks for correcting my mistake. :)

      Loading editor
  • El Conejo Blanco is a vandal who deleted all the content on my userpage and might possibly do this to other users as well

      Loading editor
    • It's their first edit so I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I've left a warning on their page. Please let me know if it happens again. ✌️

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • I know we have a thread under this message, but I'm wondering what your opinion is on the minor character articles I tagged for deletion. As you have likely guessed everything I have tagged is believed by myself to be too minor to deserve a page.

    All the character articles fall into either appearing in one episode for a brief moment, appearing in one episode with only a few lines and no contribution to the plot of the story, or appearing in one or two episodes in the background of scenes, with nothing known about the character.

    The only reason these kinds of articles were tagged is that their information can already be found on an episode or other, more plot-contributing, article(s). You have given some good examples that dispute my claims, but with the exception of some of the Lilliputtians, my argument holds true.

    I would just like to know your 2 cents. Thank you in advance!

      Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • Hello!

    I know this might be too early, but I recently reached 500 edits. I was wondering whether I am deserving of content moderator rights yet? If you can delete pages with these rights, I promise I won't be so abrupt asking for admin rights.

    I know that if I had content moderator rights, I could help monitor the Candidates for Deletion, as well as update locked pages, and perform similar duties. I have made several proposals in the discussions about changing some wiki rules to, as I believe, better the wiki.

    I know that I have kind of gone on a deletion tag spree as of late, but that is only because I want to clear out unnecessary articles to focus on everything else and make the wiki articles anyone needs easily in reach. I promise that the only articles I will delete are articles that have information already in other, "main" articles that have a great number of paragraphs contained in them.

    I understand if it is too early for the rights, and I apologize if I have tagged too many articles, but I truly, genuinely believe that I can change the wiki for the better if given this opportunity. Thank you for your consideration.

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • Lol. Well, for now I'd wait a bit longer for the moderator rights.

      And the candidates for deletion articles will need to be voted on. The only things that are immediately deleted are spam pages, duplicate images, etc.

        Loading editor
    • Okay.

      Cool. When does the voting begin?

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • Hi!

    I was wondering why the Blind Eye Society is under the "Objects" template. I might have missed something, but could you clarify?

      Loading editor
    • Considering how few there are, we didn't have a "organization" type infobox. So the objects template was used instead.

        Loading editor
    • Okay, thanks. I was just wondering why the society was under objects while other groups, such as the Globnar Tributes, are under characters.

      It might just have something to do with the members of the society already being featured under the characters template.

        Loading editor
    • Ah, I see yeah. The globnar tributes is about the people in it, while the blind eye society is about the organization.

        Loading editor
    • Ooohhhh. Thanks for clearing that up lol. I got confused. Also, thanks for the quick reply!

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • Okay, to start off, I absolutely addddore(!) your profile pic. xD it's glorious.

    Anyway, lol, I just want to tell you what I can do to help the wiki if I get rollback, and eventually, content moderator, rights.

    I haven't seen much vandalism here, but since I plan to be active at least once on most days, I will revert any I notice, and block the users at fault. As for content moderator, I will actively moderate the [[Category:Candidates for speedy deletion|Candidates for speedy deletion category]]. I will also delete unnecessary articles and spam. Lastly, I will update any locked pages that need updating.

    Thank you for considering, and goodbye!

      Loading editor
  • Hi there. I was wondering whether we use cropping on this site, as I've noticed for the majority of minor characters, other characters appear in "their" infobox image. I've also noticed models of the characters are never used as infobox images, so I'm not positive that has something to do with it. Thanks for still being active!

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • lol, this wiki is really obsessive over details. It just comes with being fans of this particular show i suppose.

      With the bikers, they're separate because they don't always show up together, as opposed to the other examples you have.

      And the football players.... I mean, I'm not super gung-ho about it. But they have their own page, probably because we not only have visuals on them, but they also got lines, even if they are one-off minor characters. You can mark it as a Candidates for Deletion and it can be argued with others if you're super against them. But I don't personally have too much a problem keeping them, and find they can occasionally be interesting..

        Loading editor
    • XD I think that’s good.

      For the bikers, I thought that would be why, but I realized Lolph appeared without Dundgren before. However, that was only one time, so I understand what you’re saying.

      I just think that because they’re a group of unnamed players that appeared for a few seconds in a made-up story from Stan, they they’re not really necessary.

      Thanks for the quick response! :)

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • Hello! I just wanted to bring to your attention that 2 articles exist for the same character, the prison warden/counselor who works at the Gravity Falls Maximum Security Prison. The former of the 2 below has the most information.

    Unnamed Warden Prison Counselor

      Loading editor
  • Can you change nigh omnipotence to virtual omnipotence or something else?

    The word nigh omnipotence doesn't seem to fit very well.

      Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message