Category talk:Candidates for deletion

!

Use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion. See archived discussions: July 9, 2012 - December 12, 2013 December 13, 2013 - November 4, 2014 December 15, 2014 - May 26, 2015 May 26, 2015 - August 28, 2016 August When discussing, please use the following templates: Support — {{S}} Oppose — {{O}} Neutral — {{N}} Comment — {{C}} BE SURE TO SIGN YOUR NAMES WITH FOUR (4) TILDE: ~~~~

Pages

Cheekums/Gallery

Support — There are only five images. Not enough to constitute a gallery. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 03:09, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Oppose — It maybe small, but that doesn't mean you should get rid of it. Sandgar (talk) 01:05, January 7, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose — It's actually six and that's enough images for a gallery, and also the artwork created by Alex is contained in it. If it were to have like 2-3 then maybe I'd say fine but nope this isn't the case. --Rai 水 (talk) 00:19, January 11, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — In the past we have deleted many galleries with more images than this one for being too small. Also, the production art should go on Little Dipper/Gallery. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 23:42, January 11, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — Oh really? Which galleries? And how many images would you consider to have a gallery? --Rai 水 (talk) 02:03, January 12, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — There used to be a gallery for Big Gunz Laser Tag. It had six images, and was deleted for being too minor. Another one is Nearly Almost Dead But Not Quite! That had five images. And Project Mentem's gallery had eight. There are plenty more, as can be seen here.

I think I said this before, but to constitute a gallery, there should be at least nine good images that are all distinct from each other. This gallery only has five. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 18:49, January 16, 2016 (UTC)

Neutral — It is pretty small, but there is an image from production artwork.--Peacexfreedom (talk) 23:13, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose — Not enough pictures unfortunately but there is some production art as others have said. Maybe there is a way to salvage this, and add in some more pictures?. Liftboard Rider 09:20, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — How could we add in more pictures? These are the pictures that we got from the series. I don't see what value this gallery has; if it doesn't have enough pictures, it should be deleted. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 14:33, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Footbot/Gallery

Support — There are only six images, none of which are very distinct (they don't reveal much about the subject). Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 23:43, April 7, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose — I think it is fine to have them in a gallery so they don't crowd the main page Sandgar, Leader of HTF Wiki 04:22, April 8, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose — I agree with Gage ✿♥Madialiano♥✿ (talk) 18:36, April 15, 2016 (UTC)

Support — Not enough pictures unfortunately. Liftboard Rider 09:20, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

Lava Lamp Shaped Demon

Support — At this point I think we should just delete this page on sight. I believe this is the third time this page has been created. This is way too minor, and it was only ever seen in the backround. It was never named, and there's no use in having a page for it. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 02:35, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

Support —  There is not enough information on the page.  However all the demons of Bill Cipher are important and should all get a page.  The page should be something along the lines of "Bill Cipher's Demons" and discuss each demon seperately.  Alone there isn't enough information for most demons to warrent a page, but they are important to the story and with all on one page there should be more than enough information to propperly make a page. Dcat682 (talk) 02:49, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

Oppose — Even though we don't have a name for it, it is one of Bill's minions. Actually, if it were to be deleted, it would be the only minion without a page. Unless all of Bill's minions were to have a combined page. I'd be cool with that.Peacexfreedom (talk) 02:55, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

Oppose — ^ Sandgar, Normal Human 13:54, January 8, 2016 (UTC)

Support — --Rai 水 (talk) 00:23, January 11, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — This may be minor, but a lot of unnamed characters appear on the show, and many are less evident then this one.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandgar (wall • contribs)

Oppose — Eh, I think it should keep its own page, like Peace said, since the rest have their own. Also, we might see more of it next episode? Juan The American Brony (talk) 16:56, February 3, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose — Hero Fan (talk) 23:44, February 16, 2016 (UTC)

Support —Page full of speculation and a fan made title to boot. Besides the page was already deleted.--Topdarlingwh (talk) 00:07, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

Neutral — I like the idea of having a page for every one of the weird creatures Bill invited. It being the exception when they others have a page, is a little... eh. But it really depends on the information we can compile from it. If we can make a serviceable page with all its appearances and history, then I'd say keep it. YazzyDream★ 01:36, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose — I agree with the arguments for keeping it listed above, but it does need some work for sure. Liftboard Rider 09:15, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — I agree that we should either keep a page for lava lamp demon or create one for Bill's henchmaniacs as a group. Lava lamp demon not being mentioned in the series is exactly the reason why he should be mentioned somewhere in the wiki, because many people don't know about the existence of this rather curious character. In a very related issue, I created another page for the same character (I didn't find his page, so I thought he didn't have one, sorry. This page's creator didn't make a good job creating links from related pages, I guess.) We should merge the pages, mine has more information and follows the article guidelines for characters, I think. Assistant Co captain Falcone (talk) 22:23, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

List of deaths

Support — It just seems very random, like having a page for "list of criminals". This page is also redundant to the existing deceased category. It is sufficient to list the cause of death/whatever on each character's page. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 13:40, May 7, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose — ThatGuy30722 - I can hold 10 babies at once! 11:09, June 11, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose — The coolest guy EVA! - It works for PIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGS! 08:08, June 18, 2016 (UTC)

Support — Dr. Dementor - We already have a page for deceased characters we dont need an extra list for it. 09:34, June 19, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — @Dr. Dementor: Well, the category doesn't explain how they died and when, you'd have to go to the character's page for that. But this is easier, it's all in one place. ThatGuy30722 - I can hold 10 babies at once! 12:01, June 20, 2016 (UTC)

Support — One could find the exact same information just by typing "Category:Deceased." Lcclamerica (talk) 06:17, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

Support —YazzyDream★ 01:36, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose — Maybe just make sure all the information about how they died is already on the pages before deleting so no information gets lost. Though Looking at it, it does make for a handy reference page. Liftboard Rider 09:20, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

Sister Mary Hilda Miley

Support — Not related to the actual series; we'd have to make a page for every Cipher Hunt clue if we kept this. The information on this page is fine on the Cipher Hunt page. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 21:47, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Support — YazzyDream★ 22:54, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Support — Geoff&Courtneyfan Hey don't steal my food! (talk) 18:19, August 28, 2016 (UTC)

Visions of Heartbreak Past

Support —This is more an effect of a potion/power right? It should be part of the potion's page or something. YazzyDream★ 10:14, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

Support — Merge with potions page. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 14:37, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

List of crossover characters

Support — Something like this can be regulated to the individual games' pages. Not to mention these only mention Villains Unite! Why not just keep the information there? YazzyDream★ 04:45, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Support — Agreed with YazzyDream. Geoff&Courtneyfan Hey don't steal my food! (talk) 20:04, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Support —Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 21:49, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Categories

Alternate Time Periods

Support — Just seems very random to have around. Yes, these things are from alternate time periods... so what? Also, this category's existence leads to such confusions as what counts as an alternate time period; should Mrs. Pines (Stan's mother) and Filbrick Pines be in this category, or are they too close to the present? And Glass Shard Beach, New Jersey in all probability still exists, so why is it an alternate time period? And the same goes for Quentin Trembley. All in all, I don't see the purpose of this category, and it just makes things more confusing. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 19:18, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Gravity Falls

Support — Duplicate of Category: A to Z--Peacexfreedom (talk) 21:41, March 7, 2016 (UTC)

Support —Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 01:46, March 8, 2016 (UTC)

Species

Support —We have a creature and character category to make a distinctive difference between them both. This just counter acts that...--Topdarlingwh (talk) 22:01, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — "Creatures" are individual, well, creatures, whereas "species" are groups/types of creatures.Peacexfreedom (talk) 22:40, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — If we could, I propose we change it so that Characters are any individual, while Creatures are the species (So, Mermando would be a Character and Merpeople would be Creatures), thus warranting the deletion of this category. It just makes sense with the infoboxes, as currently Mermando's infobox lists information that is already on the Merpeople page, when a character box could list things like age, other names, etc. Plus, for the purpose of the show and plot, Mermando is a character. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 23:13, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — I'm not so sure on that one. I kinda like having the distinction (easily via category, I mean) between humans and creatures (humans being characters, as it is now). It's not that I don't like/mind calling the individual creatures "characters" but having a category that is just the creatures (individual ones, I mean) is nice for sorting--Peacexfreedom (talk) 23:34, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — We have a category called "groups" as well...--Topdarlingwh (talk) 23:36, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — Perhaps we could then change the character category's name to "humans"? The current name just causes confusion in my view. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 00:18, February 29, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — Actually, I'd be okay with deleting the "Species" category (and making no additional changes) due to the existence of the "List of creatures" page (which seems to serve the same function).--Peacexfreedom (talk) 01:26, February 29, 2016 (UTC)

Support — On the deletion of this category, assuming nothing else will change. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 20:42, March 1, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — I suggest we put Creatures under beings who are from a species while the actual group be under species. For example, We'd put Unicorns under species, while Celestabellebethabelle would be under creatures. As for the group thing, that could go for anything. Bands, Teams, etc. so it's not the same as species. --Rai 水 (talk) 19:08, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

Support — Rachin123's idea. But will not cross out my previous support because if Rachin's idea cannot be enacted, I support the deletion of this page. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 19:29, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Category:Zodiac carriers

Support — If it's just gonna be empty, it's useless. Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 23:42, May 9, 2016 (UTC)

Deleted

Redirects

Mrs. Pines

Support — Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 21:28, May 11, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose — redirects are exist also for people searching the wiki for information. YazzyDream★ 02:04, August 1, 2016 (UTC)

Neutral — Fair point, I am on the fence about this one, since it is for a character title that we would expect people to use.Liftboard Rider 09:24, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

Comment — When one types "Mrs. Pines" into the search bar, Mrs. Pines (disambiguation) comes up anyway, so I don't see what good this page does. And we don't have a redirect called "Mr. Pines", and we've gotten along fine without that. This page also prevents us from naming the page for Stan's mother "Mrs. Pines", giving it the awkward title, "Mrs. Pines (Stan's mother)". Mr B^{Knew _yourfather _{I did!}} 14:39, August 17, 2016 (UTC)