Tag: sourceedit |
Tag: sourceedit |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
{{S}}No sense in having 2 of the same page right. Unless they make an actual appearance there's no need for a page.--[[User:PinesPrime|PinesPrime]] ([[User talk:PinesPrime|talk]]) 05:30, November 3, 2015 (UTC) |
{{S}}No sense in having 2 of the same page right. Unless they make an actual appearance there's no need for a page.--[[User:PinesPrime|PinesPrime]] ([[User talk:PinesPrime|talk]]) 05:30, November 3, 2015 (UTC) |
||
{{C}}I feel like half the people dont even look at the pages, and simply believe what they read, because if they did actually take a few seconds to look at the articles, they'd see that they have completely different cintents. [[User:Hero Fan|Hero Fan]] ([[User talk:Hero Fan|talk]]) 14:58, November 4, 2015 (UTC) |
{{C}}I feel like half the people dont even look at the pages, and simply believe what they read, because if they did actually take a few seconds to look at the articles, they'd see that they have completely different cintents. [[User:Hero Fan|Hero Fan]] ([[User talk:Hero Fan|talk]]) 14:58, November 4, 2015 (UTC) |
||
+ | {{S}} --[[User:Rachin123|Rai 水]] ([[User talk:Rachin123|talk]]) 00:25, January 11, 2016 (UTC) |
||
===[[Lava Lamp Shaped Demon]]=== |
===[[Lava Lamp Shaped Demon]]=== |
Revision as of 00:25, 11 January 2016
! | Use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion.
When discussing, please use the following templates:
BE SURE TO SIGN YOUR NAMES WITH FOUR (4) TILDE: ~~~~ |
Pages
Cheekums/Gallery
- Support — There are only five images. Not enough to constitute a gallery. Mr BKnew yourfather I did! 03:09, November 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — It maybe small, but that doesn't mean you should get rid of it. Sandgar (talk) 01:05, January 7, 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose — It's actually six and that's enough images for a gallery, and also the artwork created by Alex is contained in it. If it were to have like 2-3 then maybe I'd say fine but nope this isn't the case. --Rai 水 (talk) 00:19, January 11, 2016 (UTC)
Flying saucer
- Support —Too minor, way to generic.--Topdarlingwh (talk) 04:57, October 13, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — Because, although it may only show up just this once, it has relevance to the show/episode. The floating cliffs have made several appearances, which was created by the UFO. Also, there are codes using Bill's symbol substitution cipher inside (and this is the first time we've seen that cipher used). I would support the information being moved to a page, perhaps, on the unknown extraterrestrials (wherein a subheading would be about their UFO). --Peacexfreedom (talk) 02:43, October 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Support — Not really noticeable throughout the episode. I barely even noticed it while watching the episode. Not notable to have its own page. - PokémonGamer* 02:52, October 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment — I think I can also agree with what Peacexfreedom said. - PokémonGamer* 02:58, October 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — This is where the parts for the portal came from and could be the reason for everything in Gravity Falls. Needs more content though. It's existence has been foreshadowed since the first time we saw the cliffs. I found theories and videos about its existence weeks after the show started. I agree with Peacexfreedom. Faceted Chrysolite (talk) 06:10, October 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — It is a relatively big part of the show, and may come back as even bigger. The Future Ruler of the World!!! Or at least of this taco. (talk) 17:40, October 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — I'd suggest moving to a name actually used in the show, I don't recall anyone calling it a flying saucer in the episode. Overlordjeff (talk) 22:54, October 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —--Oneonfire1 (talk) 07:35, October 15, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —Could a sub page like said above but not on its own--Hotmage97 (talk) 07:46, October 15, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — It's an epic thing and something unusual in Gravity Falls, which makes its special, it created the portal, it created the cliffs, it's made by ALIENS, there's also a lot of information to write about it, aliens,prison droids, buttons, adhesive, it created Gravity falls!!! Or Gravity Falls created it,idk lol -- User: LGQ 08:29, October 18, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — This whole deleting articles thing is getting really ridicoulos. Here we have a location that is very important to ths show's lore and overall story, and people want it deleted because it only appeared once. Hero Fan (talk) 13:56, October 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment — I agree with Hero Fan. People want things that appeared in the journal to be deleted because they want to see the real thing, it's okay, but now some real thing has appeared and its pretty much shown throughout the whole episode and the plot of the episode is pretty much about it and people want it deleted because it only appeared once. WHAT DO YOU WANT PEOPLE!? You want it to be shown in EVERY SINGLE EPISODE!? Also, people took a lot of time and effort to write and type all the information in the page and it's just deleted just like that and then the thing is proven to be very important and appeared again in another episode and you have to create the page again and type all the things again, just sayin' --User: LGQ 14:39, October 21,2015 (UTC)
- Comment — I completely agree with you there. I never understood why so many articles are constantly deleted. Yeah, it makes sense if the pages are speculation, completely outdated or simply contain false information, but almost all of the pages deleted here are because they are "too minor". So what? It's not like it'ds taking any space away from the other pages. If anything, it makes the wiki less complete, because some people think that those informations are not interesting enough. Hero Fan (talk) 15:34, October 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —--SamC22 (talk) 18:56, October 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — This is ridiculous. This is a page about a location in Gravity Falls that Dipper and Ford visited to repair the dimensional rift. Not only that, but Ford mentioned he and McGucket visited the UFO for parts for the portal, and people say delete it because it appeared only once, and might not appear again. How many minor things with one (maybe two) appearances have pages here? --Welcome to Gravity Falls 21:19, October 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — I agree with everything LGQ said: this is a relevant LOCATION. We have pages for locations on this wiki. Northwest Manor Bottomless pit (place) Abuelita's house and the flying saucer is far more relevant than a lot of those. Do we want to get rid of those, too? Mr BKnew yourfather I did! 22:13, October 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —You guys can even decide it's a location or an object (vehicle) this page has no place on the wikia until or if it makes another appearance.--Poloznine (talk) 23:50, October 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —Should wait until another appearance. And yeah be sure on location or object before making a page.--Zoraletters100 (talk) 02:16, October 24, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —--Coolman1999 (talk) 23:50, October 27, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —--PinesPrime (talk) 05:30, November 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — I really don't undestand why it has to appear again to deserve a page. The Man Cave only appeared once and that HAS a page of it's own. TheIceClimber (talk) 14:45, November 24, 2015 (UTC)
- Support — While I really want to oppose the page would need re-worked. It's poorly worded and is filled with a bunch of fluff that doesn't matter. I went in to edit the page by removing the fluff, but I stopped and didn't publish the changes because I realized the page would only have two sentences after editing out the useless bits of information. Dcat682 (talk) 04:08, November 30, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — This saucer had a prettt good impact to the episode it appeared in. The page could use some work but it could be a good page. Even if it doesn't show again that's not the point. By the logic anything that appears once should go. --Rai 水 (talk) 00:51, December 29, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment — If this page actually got fixed, it would be a very good article to have on the wiki. Sandgar (talk) 01:02, January 7, 2016 (UTC)
Giant spiders
- Support —Too similar to Arachnimorphs, time to go.--Topdarlingwh (talk) 04:40, October 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral — I haven't played the game: how major in the game are they? (I notice we have a page for Flying skulls but not Fireflies, which are listed as antagonists in the game) We need to be consistent on what we have a page for. Mr BKnew yourfather I did! 22:32, October 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — They are technically not the same thing as the arachnimorphs, and doesn't stuff from the games count for content on the wikia? --Peacexfreedom (talk) 02:52, October 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — They aren't related at all to Arachnimorphs, and are even not in any episode. When you go to the page, you immediatly understand that it's from a game - you can't get confused. Also, they're not half-human. The Future Ruler of the World!!! Or at least of this taco. (talk) 17:42, October 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —Pure copy paste of Arachnimorphs--Oneonfire1 (talk) 07:35, October 15, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —--Hotmage97 (talk) 07:46, October 15, 2015 (UTC)
- Support — Copy paste of that page.--SamC22 (talk) 18:56, October 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — Not the same creature. Hero Fan (talk) 22:10, October 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —Clear the same also be removing one will make the wikia less ambiguous--Poloznine (talk) 23:50, October 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment — But it's not the same creature, they are only similar in the way that they are spiders. One is an enemy from an online game, the other one creatures that live on Mystery Mountain (at least one does). They are litteraly not the same thing. Hero Fan (talk) 13:45, October 22, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — lol how are they the SAME!? One is a REAL GIANT SPIDER, and another one are humans who can turn into Humanoid Spiders. Did you see the ones in the game turn into human? Also, Quentin Trembley also said about the Giant Spiders. --LGQ (talk) 14:47, October 22, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —In the reason it was never said it was just way to similar. PLUS these creatures are mentioned in the trivia.--Zoraletters100 (talk) 02:16, October 24, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — The only relation that they have to the Arachnamorphs is that they're both spider creatures. The fact that it never appears in the show shouldn't be relevant, because it still appears in Gravity Falls media. --DK Talk Contributions 22:43, October 27, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —Copy cut and paste.--Coolman1999 (talk) 23:50, October 27, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment — Are all you people who are saying "Copy and paste of a page" even looking at the page? Because the pages are not at all similar, the creatures are not at all confusing or interchangeable. Think about this: humans are more similar to gnomes than giant spiders are to arachnimorphs. Guess we better delete the Gnomes page. Mr BKnew yourfather I did! 23:12, October 29, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment — One of them has to go anyway. Because the fact that some people think that Arachnimorphs is a sub-species will cause to much edit wars. Besides they have never appeared in the series. On that same idea, with the series ending, all the things that haven't made into the series will need a lot of rethinking.--Topdarlingwh (talk) 00:32, October 30, 2015 (UTC)
- Support — Dr. Dementor (talk) 15:24, October 30, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment — We dont even know if the series is going to end soon. Like stated before, these are COMPLETELY different creatures, that people confuse them is not the fault of the article. Hero Fan (talk) 03:12, October 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment — This is exactly what I mean. The fact that people argue over the edits on a page does not mean that the solution is to delete the page. Think about it: that just makes no sense. We get a ton of edit warring on the List of allusions pages over whether or not something is an allusion. But does that mean we need to delete the page? Of course not! It is still a valuable and informative part of the wiki, and its significance to the series is in no way decreased by people on the Internet having different points of view. The argument that it is too minor is valid (you will notice that my vote is neutral); the argument that the page will cause conflict or is "copy and paste" is not. Mr BKnew yourfather I did! 01:42, November 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support —No sense in having 2 of the same page right. Unless they make an actual appearance there's no need for a page.--PinesPrime (talk) 05:30, November 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment — I feel like half the people dont even look at the pages, and simply believe what they read, because if they did actually take a few seconds to look at the articles, they'd see that they have completely different cintents. Hero Fan (talk) 14:58, November 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Support — --Rai 水 (talk) 00:25, January 11, 2016 (UTC)
Lava Lamp Shaped Demon
- Support — At this point I think we should just delete this page on sight. I believe this is the third time this page has been created. This is way too minor, and it was only ever seen in the backround. It was never named, and there's no use in having a page for it. Mr BKnew yourfather I did! 02:35, December 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Support — There is not enough information on the page. However all the demons of Bill Cipher are important and should all get a page. The page should be something along the lines of "Bill Cipher's Demons" and discuss each demon seperately. Alone there isn't enough information for most demons to warrent a page, but they are important to the story and with all on one page there should be more than enough information to propperly make a page. Dcat682 (talk) 02:49, December 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — Even though we don't have a name for it, it is one of Bill's minions. Actually, if it were to be deleted, it would be the only minion without a page. Unless all of Bill's minions were to have a combined page. I'd be cool with that.Peacexfreedom (talk) 02:55, December 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — ^ Sandgar, Normal Human 13:54, January 8, 2016 (UTC)
- Support — --Rai 水 (talk) 00:23, January 11, 2016 (UTC)
Soos' father
- Support —Until he makes an actual appearance in the series. This page belongs in the list of unseen characters. I believe that's kind of why that page was created.--Topdarlingwh (talk) 00:06, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
- Support — When I saw this page, the first thing I thought was "Huh, shouldn't this be on List of unseen characters? Page looks incomplete since he hasn't made an appearance. Mr BKnew yourfather I did! 00:11, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
- Support — Soos' father has never been shown in the show and has only been mentioned twice. If he has a page then we should have a page for Mr. and Mrs. Pines, except... they aren't important, and neither is this page Dcat682 (talk) 04:00, November 30, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — But he did appear in the latest episode. We should have a page for it!!!
- Support — Support only if the image from "Weirdmageddon Part 2: Escape From Reality" is added to his section on the List of unseen characters page.--Peacexfreedom (talk) 17:28, December 8, 2015 (UTC)
- Support — Mentioned characters do not warrant an article. They belong on list of unseen characters. - PokémonGamer* 00:56, December 9, 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — At this point, he has even more significance than Dipper and Mabel's parents, so if their page gets to stay, this one should too.
- Comment — That makes sense. Maybe it's time for that page to go, too. Mr BKnew yourfather I did! 22:07, December 14, 2015 (UTC)
O' Doell's
- Support — Oh come on really. This is just ridiculous. Very very little is known about it. All we have is the name. What's the point? --Rai 水 (talk) 00:54, January 7, 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral — There is many articles on this wiki that are very small, and have little point in the show. Though it is nice to see people do care about small things like this. Sandgar (talk) 01:00, January 7, 2016 (UTC)