Category talk:Candidates for deletion

Cheekums/Gallery
There are only five images. Not enough to constitute a gallery.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     03:09, November 1, 2015 (UTC) It maybe small, but that doesn't mean you should get rid of it. Sandgar (talk) 01:05, January 7, 2016 (UTC) It's actually six and that's enough images for a gallery, and also the artwork created by Alex is contained in it. If it were to have like 2-3 then maybe I'd say fine but nope this isn't the case. --Rai 水 (talk) 00:19, January 11, 2016 (UTC) In the past we have deleted many galleries with more images than this one for being too small. Also, the production art should go on Little Dipper/Gallery.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     23:42, January 11, 2016 (UTC) Oh really? Which galleries? And how many images would you consider to have a gallery? --Rai 水 (talk) 02:03, January 12, 2016 (UTC) There used to be a gallery for Big Gunz Laser Tag. It had six images, and was deleted for being too minor. Another one is Nearly Almost Dead But Not Quite! That had five images. And Project Mentem's gallery had eight. There are plenty more, as can be seen here.

I think I said this before, but to constitute a gallery, there should be at least nine good images that are all distinct from each other. This gallery only has five.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     18:49, January 16, 2016 (UTC)

It is pretty small, but there is an image from production artwork.--Peacexfreedom (talk) 23:13, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

Footbot/Gallery
There are only six images, none of which are very distinct (they don't reveal much about the subject).   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     23:43, April 7, 2016 (UTC) I think it is fine to have them in a gallery so they don't crowd the main page Sandgar, Leader of HTF Wiki 04:22, April 8, 2016 (UTC)

I agree with Gage ✿♥Madialiano♥✿ (talk) 18:36, April 15, 2016 (UTC)

Lava Lamp Shaped Demon
At this point I think we should just delete this page on sight. I believe this is the third time this page has been created. This is way too minor, and it was only ever seen in the backround. It was never named, and there's no use in having a page for it.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     02:35, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

There is not enough information on the page. However all the demons of Bill Cipher are important and should all get a page. The page should be something along the lines of "Bill Cipher's Demons" and discuss each demon seperately. Alone there isn't enough information for most demons to warrent a page, but they are important to the story and with all on one page there should be more than enough information to propperly make a page. Dcat682 (talk) 02:49, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

Even though we don't have a name for it, it is one of Bill's minions. Actually, if it were to be deleted, it would be the only minion without a page. Unless all of Bill's minions were to have a combined page. I'd be cool with that.Peacexfreedom (talk) 02:55, December 26, 2015 (UTC) ^ Sandgar, Normal Human 13:54, January 8, 2016 (UTC) --Rai 水 (talk) 00:23, January 11, 2016 (UTC) This may be minor, but a lot of unnamed characters appear on the show, and many are less evident then this one. Eh, I think it should keep its own page, like Peace said, since the rest have their own. Also, we might see more of it next episode? Juan The American Brony (talk) 16:56, February 3, 2016 (UTC) Hero Fan (talk) 23:44, February 16, 2016 (UTC) Page full of speculation and a fan made title to boot. Besides the page was already deleted.--Topdarlingwh (talk) 00:07, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

Spin the Person
This is way too minor and can be summed up in one sentence: "The demons then sit in a circle and shout 'Spin the Person,' similar to spin the bottle, and proceed to spin a petrified person around, and whoever the person's head points at is eaten." There. That is literally all the information on this article.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     23:06, February 28, 2016 (UTC) got to agree with Mr. B on this one Sandgar, Leader of HTF Wiki 23:07, February 28, 2016 (UTC) Too minor, plainly ridiculous page, and it was was just a pun on spin the bottle.--Topdarlingwh (talk) 23:38, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

I would word the page a little differently than Mr. B, but all spin the person is, is a direct work around for Hirsch to get another Spin the Bottle Referance into the show. It leads to no plot development whatsoever. Dcat682 (talk) 20:12, February 29, 2016 (UTC)

Gravity Falls
Duplicate of Category: A to Z--Peacexfreedom (talk) 21:41, March 7, 2016 (UTC)   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     01:46, March 8, 2016 (UTC)

Species
We have a creature and character category to make a distinctive difference between them both. This just counter acts that...--Topdarlingwh (talk) 22:01, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

"Creatures" are individual, well, creatures, whereas "species" are groups/types of creatures.Peacexfreedom (talk) 22:40, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

If we could, I propose we change it so that Characters are any individual, while Creatures are the species (So, Mermando would be a Character and Merpeople would be Creatures), thus warranting the deletion of this category. It just makes sense with the infoboxes, as currently Mermando's infobox lists information that is already on the Merpeople page, when a character box could list things like age, other names, etc. Plus, for the purpose of the show and plot, Mermando is a character.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     23:13, February 28, 2016 (UTC) I'm not so sure on that one. I kinda like having the distinction (easily via category, I mean) between humans and creatures (humans being characters, as it is now). It's not that I don't like/mind calling the individual creatures "characters" but having a category that is just the creatures (individual ones, I mean) is nice for sorting--Peacexfreedom (talk) 23:34, February 28, 2016 (UTC) We have a category called "groups" as well...--Topdarlingwh (talk) 23:36, February 28, 2016 (UTC) Perhaps we could then change the character category's name to "humans"? The current name just causes confusion in my view.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     00:18, February 29, 2016 (UTC) Actually, I'd be okay with deleting the "Species" category (and making no additional changes) due to the existence of the "List of creatures" page (which seems to serve the same function).--Peacexfreedom (talk) 01:26, February 29, 2016 (UTC) On the deletion of this category, assuming nothing else will change.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     20:42, March 1, 2016 (UTC) I suggest we put Creatures under beings who are from a species while the actual group be under species. For example, We'd put Unicorns under species, while Celestabellebethabelle would be under creatures. As for the group thing, that could go for anything. Bands, Teams, etc. so it's not the same as species. --Rai 水 (talk) 19:08, March 2, 2016 (UTC)