Board Thread:Voting/@comment-5475153-20150220171939/@comment-3075253-20150224015356

True, but when those names are said in the cartoon they're done for comedic value. We have to take them as canon because they've been said in a perfectly canon episode. Blerble and Lamanic are tweets from two writers of the show who were trying to make jokes that aren't incorporated into the cartoon itself; it's not the same comedic purpose that the names you mentioned above serve. An example is Toot-Toot McBumpersnazzle; the audience watching are expected to find this funny because it will serve its comedic purpose to the audience. You can't justify the name's being canon because they're meant to be funny and fit the show's comedic purpose, because the audience isn't expected to go on the writers' Twitter accounts and scroll through every tweet, then see these names and laugh at them. If they wanted these names to be something the show's audience acknowledges and finds humorous, they'll put them in a script for an episode. However, c onsidering the fuss we've all made about these names, I won't be surprised if they end up doing that.