Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-25285156-20150130030202/@comment-26072045-20150228220058

MinecraftPercabeth wrote: OnlyOnTuesdays88 wrote: "He looks like him" isn't valid evidece. I didn't say that seen was evidence for Stanley's existence. I said that's why we assume he's Stanford's twin.

There is no evidence for the Stanley theory. That's why it's a theory. No, but you DID say that if he exists then they're twins.

And "Stanley" does definitely exist, but he's not necessarilly Stan's twin or the author.