Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24597765-20150909003444/@comment-4075764-20150920063943

Eh. I agree with everything you said, but it was still worth it for the initial thrill of Dipper VS Stanford and hearing the backstory between him and Bill, as well as the whole "new pawn" setup. the Mabel plot wasn't very interesting, and the Dipper plot had some logical flaws, but nothing was truly BAD, per say. I'm finding more and more that when an episode has to devote subplots to Mabel, they're ALWAYS inferior to Dipper's plots in every way, especially in episodes like Sock Opera and Northwest Manor Noir, where they feel like a waste of time compared to the rest of the episode.