Category talk:Candidates for deletion/Archive5

Barbecue Grill Monster
  Mr B     Knew your father I did!     04:54, October 9, 2016 (UTC)

Valkryie247 (talk) 04:59, October 9, 2016 (UTC)

I would have deleted it immediately if people didn't have an issue with it, but eh. Flash of Memory (talk) 08:50, October 9, 2016 (UTC)

14:17, October 9, 2016 (UTC) ❌

Cheekums/Gallery
There are only five images. Not enough to constitute a gallery.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     03:09, November 1, 2015 (UTC) It maybe small, but that doesn't mean you should get rid of it. Sandgar (talk) 01:05, January 7, 2016 (UTC) It's actually six and that's enough images for a gallery, and also the artwork created by Alex is contained in it. If it were to have like 2-3 then maybe I'd say fine but nope this isn't the case. --Rai 水 (talk) 00:19, January 11, 2016 (UTC) In the past we have deleted many galleries with more images than this one for being too small. Also, the production art should go on Little Dipper/Gallery.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     23:42, January 11, 2016 (UTC) Oh really? Which galleries? And how many images would you consider to have a gallery? --Rai 水 (talk) 02:03, January 12, 2016 (UTC) There used to be a gallery for Big Gunz Laser Tag. It had six images, and was deleted for being too minor. Another one is Nearly Almost Dead But Not Quite! That had five images. And Project Mentem's gallery had eight. There are plenty more, as can be seen here.

I think I said this before, but to constitute a gallery, there should be at least nine good images that are all distinct from each other. This gallery only has five.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     18:49, January 16, 2016 (UTC)

It is pretty small, but there is an image from production artwork.--Peacexfreedom (talk) 23:13, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

Not enough pictures unfortunately but there is some production art as others have said. Maybe there is a way to salvage this, and add in some more pictures?. Liftboard Rider 09:20, August 12, 2016 (UTC)


 * How could we add in more pictures? These are the pictures that we got from the series. I don't see what value this gallery has; if it doesn't have enough pictures, it should be deleted.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     14:33, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

The Cranky Girl Who Did Chores in Spirit Town
Way too minor, was just an offhanded mention in a book; would be fine as a trivia point; every bit of information on this page could be summed up as a trivia point.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     02:20, September 20, 2016 (UTC)

I agree. I believe that no piece of information should be erased, even if it's very minor, but if it's better as something else, like a trivia point, then it shouldn't be an article. This should be added to Mabel's trivia (I won't do it, since I don't have the Journal, where the information comes from). Assistant Co captain Falcone (talk) 03:06, September 20, 2016 (UTC) ❌

Lava Lamp Shaped Demon
At this point I think we should just delete this page on sight. I believe this is the third time this page has been created. This is way too minor, and it was only ever seen in the backround. It was never named, and there's no use in having a page for it.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     02:35, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

There is not enough information on the page. However all the demons of Bill Cipher are important and should all get a page. The page should be something along the lines of "Bill Cipher's Demons" and discuss each demon seperately. Alone there isn't enough information for most demons to warrent a page, but they are important to the story and with all on one page there should be more than enough information to propperly make a page. Dcat682 (talk) 02:49, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

Even though we don't have a name for it, it is one of Bill's minions. Actually, if it were to be deleted, it would be the only minion without a page. Unless all of Bill's minions were to have a combined page. I'd be cool with that.Peacexfreedom (talk) 02:55, December 26, 2015 (UTC) ^ Sandgar, Normal Human 13:54, January 8, 2016 (UTC) --Rai 水 (talk) 00:23, January 11, 2016 (UTC) This may be minor, but a lot of unnamed characters appear on the show, and many are less evident then this one. Eh, I think it should keep its own page, like Peace said, since the rest have their own. Also, we might see more of it next episode? Juan The American Brony (talk) 16:56, February 3, 2016 (UTC) Hero Fan (talk) 23:44, February 16, 2016 (UTC) Page full of speculation and a fan made title to boot. Besides the page was already deleted.--Topdarlingwh (talk) 00:07, February 28, 2016 (UTC) I like the idea of having a page for every one of the weird creatures Bill invited. It being the exception when they others have a page, is a little... eh. But it really depends on the information we can compile from it. If we can make a serviceable page with all its appearances and history, then I'd say keep it. 01:36, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

I agree with the arguments for keeping it listed above, but it does need some work for sure. Liftboard Rider 09:15, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

 I agree that we should either keep a page for lava lamp demon or create one for Bill's henchmaniacs as a group. Lava lamp demon not being mentioned in the series is exactly the reason why he should be mentioned somewhere in the wiki, because many people don't know about the existence of this rather curious character. In a very related issue, I created another page for the same character (I didn't find his page, so I thought he didn't have one, sorry. This page's creator didn't make a good job creating links from related pages, I guess.) We should merge the pages, mine has more information and follows the article guidelines for characters, I think. Assistant Co captain Falcone (talk) 22:23, August 29, 2016 (UTC)

Please let me remind you the article guidelines: " Each character gets an article, as long as they are important enough. What defines important enough are shown in the three standards below.
 * Every character that visually appears on the show is allowed to have a page, except for characters that only appear in a group and don't perform any unique individual actions
 * For the above group characters, a character page about the group should be created instead. (Example: Manotaurs) (Lava lamp demon is one of the latter, but there is no group page for the henchmaniacs, so it should be allowed to have a page)
 * Unseen characters are all listed on the List of unseen characters article.
 * We have some lists of characters, objects, creatures, and animals since individually they do not merit their own pages." Assistant Co captain Falcone (talk) 20:12, September 22, 2016 (UTC)

List of deaths
It just seems very random, like having a page for "list of criminals". This page is also redundant to the existing deceased category. It is sufficient to list the cause of death/whatever on each character's page.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     13:40, May 7, 2016 (UTC)

ThatGuy30722 - I can hold 10 babies at once! 11:09, June 11, 2016 (UTC)

The coolest guy EVA! - It works for PIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGS! 08:08, June 18, 2016 (UTC)

Dr. Dementor - We already have a page for deceased characters we dont need an extra list for it. 09:34, June 19, 2016 (UTC)

@Dr. Dementor: Well, the category doesn't explain how they died and when, you'd have to go to the character's page for that. But this is easier, it's all in one place. ThatGuy30722 - I can hold 10 babies at once! 12:01, June 20, 2016 (UTC)

One could find the exact same information just by typing "Category:Deceased." Lcclamerica (talk) 06:17, July 14, 2016 (UTC) 01:36, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

Maybe just make sure all the information about how they died is already on the pages before deleting so no information gets lost. Though Looking at it, it does make for a handy reference page. Liftboard Rider 09:20, August 12, 2016 (UTC) ❌

Sister Mary Hilda Miley
Not related to the actual series; we'd have to make a page for every Cipher Hunt clue if we kept this. The information on this page is fine on the Cipher Hunt page.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     21:47, August 26, 2016 (UTC) 22:54, August 26, 2016 (UTC) Geoff&#38;Courtneyfan Hey don&#39;t steal my food! (talk) 18:19, August 28, 2016 (UTC) the article is just too fun not to keep http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/central/images/f/f1/Pineapple_u86.gif The  P K ( Wall • Guestbook ) http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/central/images/a/ae/Mudkip.png 23:03, August 29, 2016 (UTC) Mary Hilda Miley isn't actually a Cipher Hunt clue, it's a plenary character of Cipher Hunt, at least for that fact that we can even hear her voice in Grunkle Stan's phone message. I'd also like to add that Cipher Hunt is a big event in Gravity Falls history, and my opinion is that every character that was involved into it should have it's own page. Richardsn (talk) 15:12, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

Sure, the article needs some work to fulfill the guidelines, but she is an actual (non-canon) character that isn't included in any other page. Cipher Hunt mentions her, but it's not a page about characters. A good wiki is an expansive wiki, with lots of information, not a wiki where we cut out every piece of information for the sake of briefness. Assistant Co captain Falcone (talk) 22:53, September 3, 2016 (UTC) Convinced me. 00:59, October 6, 2016 (UTC)

List of crossover characters
Something like this can be regulated to the individual games' pages. Not to mention these only mention Villains Unite! Why not just keep the information there? 04:45, August 26, 2016 (UTC) Agreed with YazzyDream. Geoff&#38;Courtneyfan Hey don&#39;t steal my food! (talk) 20:04, August 26, 2016 (UTC)   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     21:49, August 26, 2016 (UTC)  Assistant Co captain Falcone (talk) 21:39, September 17, 2016 (UTC) ❌

Tower Bell
I was gonna delete this page but, not entirely sure. It appears for roughly 3 seconds but, does anyone think it merits a full page? Valkryie247 (talk) 20:18, September 30, 2016 (UTC) Why was it deleted already? It shouldn't have. From the article guidelines: " Every character that visually appears on the show is allowed to have a page,  except  for characters that only appear in a group and don't perform any unique individual actions." It doesn't matter how minor the character is, it can have a page as long as it's not part of a group. The bell isn't part of a group, so it is allowed to have a page. And it doesn't just visually appear, it also speaks. It doesn't harm anyone to make an article about it, the only condition is to fulfill the article guidelines. Assistant Co captain Falcone (talk) 01:59, October 1, 2016 (UTC) True. I'm not sure who deleted the page either, but I guess they didn't consult this page first. :| I'm going with Oppose on this one. I deleted it, I find it less troublesome deleting such an insignificant page right as its made before a discussion for deletion is started. Mimmicking the words of ur boi Stan Pines, "I guess i didn't delete fast enough." Not to mention some of these suggested deletions have been here for months. Flash of Memory (talk) 17:59, October 4, 2016 (UTC) ❌

Alternate Time Periods
Just seems very random to have around. Yes, these things are from alternate time periods... so what? Also, this category's existence leads to such confusions as what counts as an alternate time period; should Mrs. Pines (Stan's mother) and Filbrick Pines be in this category, or are they too close to the present? And Glass Shard Beach, New Jersey in all probability still exists, so why is it an alternate time period? And the same goes for Quentin Trembley. All in all, I don't see the purpose of this category, and it just makes things more confusing.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     19:18, August 19, 2016 (UTC) ❌

Gravity Falls
Duplicate of Category: A to Z--Peacexfreedom (talk) 21:41, March 7, 2016 (UTC)   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     01:46, March 8, 2016 (UTC) ❌

Species
We have a creature and character category to make a distinctive difference between them both. This just counter acts that...--Topdarlingwh (talk) 22:01, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

"Creatures" are individual, well, creatures, whereas "species" are groups/types of creatures.Peacexfreedom (talk) 22:40, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

If we could, I propose we change it so that Characters are any individual, while Creatures are the species (So, Mermando would be a Character and Merpeople would be Creatures), thus warranting the deletion of this category. It just makes sense with the infoboxes, as currently Mermando's infobox lists information that is already on the Merpeople page, when a character box could list things like age, other names, etc. Plus, for the purpose of the show and plot, Mermando is a character.   Mr B     Knew your father I did!     23:13, February 28, 2016 (UTC) I'm not so sure on that one. I kinda like having the distinction (easily via category, I mean) between humans and creatures (humans being characters, as it is now). It's not that I don't like/mind calling the individual creatures "characters" but having a category that is just the creatures (individual ones, I mean) is nice for sorting--Peacexfreedom (talk) 23:34, February 28, 2016 (UTC) We have a category called "groups" as well...--Topdarlingwh (talk) 23:36, February 28, 2016 (UTC) Perhaps we could then change the character category's name to "humans"? The current name just causes confusion in my view. <font color="#660099" face="Curlz MT">  Mr B     Knew your father I did!     00:18, February 29, 2016 (UTC) Actually, I'd be okay with deleting the "Species" category (and making no additional changes) due to the existence of the "List of creatures" page (which seems to serve the same function).--Peacexfreedom (talk) 01:26, February 29, 2016 (UTC) On the deletion of this category, assuming nothing else will change. <font color="#660099" face="Curlz MT">  Mr B     Knew your father I did!     20:42, March 1, 2016 (UTC) I suggest we put Creatures under beings who are from a species while the actual group be under species. For example, We'd put Unicorns under species, while Celestabellebethabelle would be under creatures. As for the group thing, that could go for anything. Bands, Teams, etc. so it's not the same as species. --Rai 水 (talk) 19:08, March 2, 2016 (UTC) Rachin123's idea. But will not cross out my previous support because if Rachin's idea cannot be enacted, I support the deletion of this page. <font color="#660099" face="Curlz MT">  Mr B     Knew your father I did!     19:29, August 19, 2016 (UTC) ❌

Category:Zodiac carriers
If it's just gonna be empty, it's useless. <font color="#660099" face="Curlz MT">  Mr B     Knew your father I did!     23:42, May 9, 2016 (UTC) ❌

Category:Cipher Hunt
08:35, September 18, 2016 (UTC) ❌