Board Thread:Site Problems and Appearance/@comment-8161155-20160703100729/@comment-6052262-20160703154445

This actually sounds pretty solid. I agree with at least 6 months in-between demotion threads for the same reason, as we just had 3 attempts for ThePK, 2 for Peacexfreedom, and one for me that was tried at HTF. I agree with the 2/3rds of the community needing to agree to pass something, tho it shouldn't apply for admin decisions since there's only 5 of us at the moment, and issues can arise quickly, demonstrated by a previous vote we held while taking into account the 2/3rds suggestion. Holding a demotion forum for banning/blocking without reason is common sense. Opposes/supprts must show some sort of evidence, since people tend to join the support bandwagon on demotion threads after a bit of ummm "mind poisoning" and "manipulation." Trust me, I've seen people be manipulated horribly, mostly the really young users. Also, 100 edits can be achieved by anyone with just spamming random stuff on walls. I would expect at least 50 of those being good faith edits on the mainspace or filespace, but I don't know what the rest think. I guess it can be left to admin decision to decide if enough users have voted. I would say 15 would be a good number but that can vary.


 * Anyways, this is my opinion. Nice thread Mr B.