Category talk:Candidates for deletion

Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion.

Mystery Series
Mystery series doesn't need to be deleted. If anything, it could be used to merge the seperate pages for 2 and 3. Instead of having multiple pages, since they're so closely linked, you could have just one page, Mystery Series, that contains all of the information, and is more fit to discuss future information about who the author was, what the purpose is, etc. etc. Mystery Series already has info that neither 2 nor 3 covers.

Pablo360 19:48, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it should be the opposite. We should merge the information from the Mystery Series into the respective articles. We don't even know what the official series is called, "Mystery" is just a speculative name. Also, they aren't a single entity, so they should be on separate pages. They are owned by different people and have different uses. It should be deleted.[ SaberSworn] [ Talk][ Contributions]19:52, July 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * Even so, they are very closely related. There at least should be some kind of page linking them up, as in the future, if 1 is ever discovered, or the author is found out, it will become cumbersome not having a sort of general page for this stuff.  Plus, it can be renamed easily if ever needed, so the point about the name is void.  I personally think that having individual pages is cumbersome, as one may want more info at a glance, but I see we shall be keeping them.  Even so, Mysterious Series should remain, unless you argue that someone wouldn't care about learning about the series as a whole.
 * No, it should not. I'm going to merge them. The speculative name itself is reason for doing so. We like to have official names, not made-up ones that sound pretty.  [ SaberSworn] [ Talk][ Contributions]</li></li></ul></li></ul> 20:01, July 9, 2012 (UTC)

And add things new in Gravity Falls to the paper. Like what dipper did or does to it. It should not be deleted!

Summary: page deleted

Two pages
Scuttlebutt Island is definitely large enough to warrant its own page. Gravity Falls Gossiper is, as well. These things shouldn't have even been added to this category in the first place. A Light Shining in the Darkness - Talk -  Dancing Shadows  00:15, July 22, 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but you guys need to be more careful with what you keep and what you haphazardly delete. If you think deleting Scuttlebutt Island and Gravity Falls Gossiper is fine, but Stoic Magazine or Beavers should be kept... Well, you should probably reassess your process of thinking. A Light Shining in the Darkness  - Talk -  Dancing Shadows  00:58, July 22, 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree, the page is large enough now. 15:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

Characters

 * Support: Redundant  EvergreenFir   01:31, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * Support: this page is so unnecessary --JAZ!!! <font color="DimGray"> [Talk to me] 13:53, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Support: No need for it. 15:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

Downtown Gravity Falls

 * Support: I think we should merge it with Gravity Falls, Oregon. 15:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

Category:Recurring characters

 * Oppose: Category is useful. If we are to break up all characters into categories, "main", "recurring", "one-shot" seem like logical choices.  Every character should have one of those categories on it.   EvergreenFir   01:31, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright, I see your point there. I do still say we get rid of "Gravity Falls Residents", however. A Light Shining in the Darkness  - Talk -  Dancing Shadows  01:33, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * I can agree to that.  EvergreenFir   01:52, July 22, 2012 (UTC)

Stoic Monthly

 * Support: Too minor  EvergreenFir   01:31, July 22, 2012 (UTC)

Pitt Cola

 * Support: Too minor to deserve own page.  EvergreenFir   00:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: If we can't keep the page, there should at least be a page consisting of some products such as magazines or beverages, sold only in gravity falls. Clawedfrog 14:32, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

Opossum Monthly

 * Support: Too minor to deserve own page.  EvergreenFir   00:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Support: Should be added to Mystery Shack Merchandise Tuckyd! Says Hi 18:13, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

Fake IDs

 * Support: Too minor to deserve own page.  EvergreenFir   00:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Support: Very unnecessary. 15:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Against: Its a stub not spam

Woodpecker

 * Support: Too minor to deserve own page.  EvergreenFir   00:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Support: Very unnecessary. 15:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Against: The precedent exists. Tuckyd! Says Hi 18:14, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

Images
File:Fake_ids.png
 * Support: Edit of screenshot.  EvergreenFir   00:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

File:Fakie.jpeg
 * Support: Edit of screenshot.  EvergreenFir   00:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

File:Screen Shot 2012-07-22 at 6.14.13 PM.png
 * Support: Duplicate with TV-Y7 and other marks on it.  EvergreenFir   00:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

File:Screen_Shot_2012-07-22_at_6.14.15_PM.png
 * Support: Duplicate and has channel's mark on bottom right corner.  EvergreenFir   00:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)