Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28417006-20160123065023/@comment-4854965-20160123072443

I disagree with doing this for every named character. I understand where you're coming from, but there are character galleries, which might be neater for characters with fewer appearances, such as Melody. As I had mentioned to Juan elsewhere, I don't think that Melody or Trembley should have their own category, yet they appear twice (the latter is pictured). So, the "every named character" rule would have to be modified to account for named characters that recur, but do not get their own category. (I hope my phrasing here makes sense).

Juan, are there any in particular that you especially feel like they deserve their own category?