Forum:Gravity Falls Wiki standards

After seeing Gravity Falls for the first time, I liked it quite a lot, which inevitably led to me seeing if there was any kind of wiki for it. When I came here, I was honestly quite put off by the current substandard quality the wiki currently holds. I'm not sure if it's just because I'm used to high-quality wikis such as the Avatar Wiki and Young Justice Wiki, but I believe that Gravity Falls, a show with such fantastic animation and quality, deserves a wiki of equal stature, which is why I have a few suggestions to improve the wiki's current quality.
 * Comments - The article comments on the wiki really bring down the wiki's overall quality, as seen here. Many comments are poorly written, nonsensical, and generally unattractive. Either comments should be removed (for the time being, at least) or they should receive stronger moderation.
 * Images - There are quite a few apparent problems with images that I could immediately see while first joining this wiki. First of all, the names. Images with unattractive names, such as Gf5.jpg and MyGravityFallsPic.jpg, are very off-putting, and should be either renamed or deleted. Another issue is image ratio. I believe all images taken directly from episodes should subscribe to a certain ratio, preferably 444x250 (16:9), for purposes of organization. Image quality is also a problem. From what I've seen, most images here are .jpg files, which tend to look very grainy and low-quality when resized; .png files should be the only images allowed, or at least preferred, as they are of the highest quality.
 * Galleries - Gallery pages, in my opinion, have no place on this wiki, or any wiki, as they serve no real encyclopedic purpose. A character's image category, such as Mabel images, should be used instead, as well as being linked to in the template, not on the main article content.
 * Templates - A lot of the templates, such as the infobox and Characters template, are very unattractive and bland, and could use some general touching up.

There are a few more quality problems I'd like to try and fix, but I think the ones I've listed should be the ones corrected immediately. So, thoughts? —Random Ranaun (Talk to me! ) 19:50, June 28, 2012 (UTC)