Board Thread:Site Problems and Appearance/@comment-8161155-20150403130247/@comment-8161155-20150405134505

Jeager Bombastics wrote: The fact of the matter though is that they are in fact cretures, and we can't ignore that. I understand that it doesn't do them justice, but at this point as long as they are a human they are classified under character, and if they aren't human then they are classified under creature. It's the way it has to be. Just because he is in a crature page doesn't mean we don't give him as much information as we can. Even though someone like Mermando is more specified than the rest of his species, he is stil a creature himself. You are missing my point completely. The category is called "characters" not "humans". Nothing about the word "character" means it has to be a human. "It's the way it has to be"? That's not even an argument; that's a parent telling a child why they can't have cupcakes."Just because he is in a crature page doesn't mean we don't give him as much information as we can." But don't we want to give him a character page and give him more information? Isn't that the point of the wiki? To have as much information as we can? I know that Mermando is a creature, but he's also a character, and he's first and foremost a ''character. Mer people'' are creatures, because, as a species, they are not characters as much as they are creatures. The wiki should be able to distinguish the individual from the species.