Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5630100-20130725190703/@comment-31166511-20170221164010

Madialiano wrote: I like this theory! I that Stan fits most requirements for freemasonry except:

He doesn't have much religious background

And ( idk for sure but) I think you have to have a clean record law wise  which Stan definitely doesn't

I don't know much about the requirements for joining the modern day Shriners, but the Freemasons founded by Adam Weipsheit (can't recall exact spelling) in Baravia in the late 1700s were considered a secret society with revolutionary objectives. Members who weren't willing to bend the rules or risk getting their hands dirty would not be much use to a group trying to controll the government and usurp the power of the Church.

Stan would have made an ideal Freemason--in the traditional sense.

"Everything is legal when there are no cops around!"

is not too far from:

"Nothing is true, everthing is permissible."

Which is the motto of the original Assassins, often closely associated with the Illuminati.

Mabel's Congressional declaration:

"I'm legalizing everything" is not too far off either.