Board Thread:Voting/@comment-24639508-20150101234517/@comment-5475153-20150112003240

1. Can you elaborate on your assertion of that being "not true?" Was my definition incorrect, or was another comment against appointing new admins? I highly support holding an opinion vote to clarify the issue; we should do this before anything else.

2. If you take an active role in the community, people will come to you. A two month gap between edits makes it pretty clear that you probably won't respond to a message.

3. Yazzy had logged in over those few days; I notified her, and she could see her notifications. All she had to do was leave a reply and press a button.

4. I'm glad we can agree on that point.

I mean no offense to any of the current administrators in my comments; I just think a little extra help could be good. There are rollbacks, chatmods, and regular users who edit on a daily basis, and they're highly active in other parts of the community.

If being an admin is, like you said, just a few extra buttons, what's the big deal in appointing one or two new ones?