Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26408630-20150313212317/@comment-14512598-20150323001601

Itrogash wrote: Still incedibly disagree. Of course he's angry that she didn't listen to him at the time. It wasn't betrayal though. She didn't betray him! She just didn't listen to him and chose to trust a con man. Yea, you get angry when someone doesn't listen to your advice but you know, they didn't betray your trust by not listening to you. Not only that, it turned out Dipper was wrong. Had he prevented Stan from suceeding, He would have trapped his brother (and own grandfather) in an unknown reality for eternity and lost his chance to meet the author! That's why I think he won't take this too hard. It all turned out all right in the end. He's definitely going to take the Grunkle distrust hard. Hirsch at least confirmed that. But not with Mabel or anything, she just disobeyed him, didn't betray his trust.