Thread:Topdarlingwh/@comment-8161155-20150924221101/@comment-8161155-20150927045548

Topdarlingwh wrote: Like I said that is adding speculation and is clearly contradicting itself. Also, "The revelations have to fit all of the criteria, not just one of them." This list is not a rule on the wikia. So until a rule is made on the wikia I'm just following the "unofficial guideline" of: "Every new finding about a character is to be considered a character revelation."

I know that it is not the official rule. But if you list every new finding about the character then you are going to have things like "Mabel likes lemonade" which if you ask me should not be there along with "Stan has a twin brother who is the author of the journals."