Board Thread:Voting/@comment-24639508-20150101234517/@comment-5475153-20150111224803

Tuckyd, admin inactivity is a serious issue. Even if the lower-level users have been doing a decent job taking care of the Wiki, administrators still need to be active; you guys are the only ones who can block vandals from the Wiki, undelete pages, and more. I'm sure everyone can understand if you guys are busy, but if none of you come online, then there's a problem. You went two months without editing. EF has only made ten edits in December, and he hasn't even logged in since the new year. All three of you have been rather unresponsive on your message walls, and others have been stepping in to answer questions for you. Again, even if you think our Wiki is good, especially when compared to others, there's always room for improvement. An increased number of admins isn't necessarily a bad thing; the Wiki has had more than three in the past, and we were more than fine. You may appreciate the balance of power between yourself, Yazzy, and EF, but none of you have been taking care of your part of the Wiki. There seems to be an overwhelming consensus by most users that we need more involvement from admins, and the only options are to appoint new ones, or for you guys to be a lot more active.